DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1007
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
DIC
Docket No. NR7189-14
17 Mar 15
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552. ,
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on:
16 March 2015.:. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed
in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures: :
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary. material
considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with
all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board
considered the advisory opinion furnished by OCNO memo 7220 Ser
N130C2/15U0151 dated 5 February 2015, a copy of which was provided to
you on 7 February 2015, and is being provided to you now. The Board
took into consideration your response to the Advisory Opinion received
12 March 2015.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,
the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to
establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In
this context, the Board substantially concurred with the comments
contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has
been denied. The names and votes of-the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new evidence within one.
year from the date of the Board's decision. New evidence is evidence
not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in
this case. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of
Docket No. NR7189-14
probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
ROBERT J. O'NEILL
Executive Director
Enclosure: OCNO: memo 7220 Ser N130C2/215U0151 dtd 5 Feb 15
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3218 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application cn 9 March 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of Docket No.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7386 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 April 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of Docket No.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9255 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 April 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval Docket No.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7118 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 April 2015. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by OCNO memo 7220 Ser N130D/14U1467 of 4 November 2014, a copy of which is attached. However, the Board found that your orders to VP-45 had a Projected Rotation Date (PRD) of November 2015.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5674 14
AR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 December 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. NR5674-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4191 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 December 2013. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNP Memo 7220 Ser N130C2/13U0816 dated 16 September 2013, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3471 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR COR! TION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 Docket ! NR32471-14 24 Maz E This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552 A three-member panel of g in executive ses c 5 Your all rdance with admini oO e Yy considere ri y Lon 1 shed by OCNO memo N130C2/15U1 i ( ry 2015 copy of which iis ee Arter ana conscientious considerati Che ¢€ re recora C...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6552 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY ARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECOF nae io 70 SUITE 1001 Dear Thiec i wour annlicratior . sate Ae f ‘ TALS s YOUr application C Ci y if 1 a Y rd and e il Tele - he - = ‘ In ad tt ird cons 3 dered N130C2/15UC of which v provided t Yr at icat mn Has Cl Wel Wil De that the c cannot be syed rea a+ Docket probable material error or injustice. Sincerely, ROBERT J. O'NEILL Executive Director Enclosure: OCNO memo 7220 Ser N130C2/15U0159 dtd 5 Feb 1 No.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6066 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 November 2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by OCNO Memo 7220 Ser Wi30C/14U1348 dated 15 October 2014, a copy of which was sent to you on 18 October 2014; it was returned to sender on 5 November 2014. De Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5250 13
NR5250-13 1i March 2014 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.